COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.956 [SLACK_001170] · slack_pm:msg:09946

Page text: p.956 · original PDF

Date
2021-06-21 17:27
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker
Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

No?

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-06-21 17:19 Andrew Rambaut open
    @Andrew Rambaut I have lazily put in a few 'REF's where it seem to need it. If they are still there tomorrow, I will gohunting.
  2. 2021-06-21 17:24 Edward C. Holmes open
    Sure. I'm out of town this week and don't have much time to do much, but I'll take a look later. Is there anything about the rooting in the paper? I think we had probably add a line about this...I agree with Kristian's logic - I don't see why the sequence closest to RaTG13 is the root.
  3. 2021-06-21 17:25 Andrew Rambaut open
    Be good to preempt them
  4. 2021-06-21 17:26 Edward C. Holmes open
    Have you seen Sergei's Italian job?
  5. 2021-06-21 17:27 Andrew Rambaut
    No?
  6. 2021-06-21 17:27 Kristian G. Andersen open
    The problem with the rooting is that it's very complex so not sure we want to add it - working on a paper with Joel and Marc that should settle this. But it's just so frustrating to see their naiveté - especially since they know a lot more about rooting than I do. But this one is obvious...
  7. 2021-06-21 17:27 Edward C. Holmes open
    Ok...I'll find it....definitely keep this to yourself...
  8. 2021-06-21 17:27 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Oh boy.
  9. 2021-06-21 17:29 Edward C. Holmes open
    Check out Figure 2 [shared file(s): 21-09335_Proof_hi.pdf]

Full conversation →