Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.953 [SLACK_001167] · slack_pm:msg:09921

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Agreed. He brought up the pangolin genomes. And RaTG13. It's full on conspiracy. \

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-06-20 16:50 Edward C. Holmes open

I can't believe he is really that naive
2021-06-20 16:51 Kristian G. Andersen open

After this meeting, I honestly think something might be wrong with him. But I'm not going to speculate.
2021-06-20 16:51 Kristian G. Andersen open

And it's not as much naive as it's willful ignorance.
2021-06-20 16:52 Edward C. Holmes open

I'm just disgusted that he has printed a FOIAd email in which the authors have no say
2021-06-20 16:52 Kristian G. Andersen

Agreed. He brought up the pangolin genomes. And RaTG13. It's full on conspiracy. \
2021-06-20 16:54 Kristian G. Andersen open

"I'm just asking questions". He ended on talking about other data that had been deleted - from GISAID. My Google search above - I wonder where he got that idea from.... (stuff is being deleted on GISAID all the time - we do it,Andrew does it, everybody does it - when we realize the data aren't quite right / contaminants).
2021-06-20 16:59 Edward C. Holmes open

Amazing
2021-06-20 17:01 Kristian G. Andersen open

I'm sure Tony had to make an extra call to his security service - "Be ready, folks". Anyways - we'll see. But hugely disappointing. Archiving a version of the preprint here with my highlights. [shared file(s): Bloom Preprint.pdf]
2021-06-20 17:05 Edward C. Holmes open

Is it up yet? I'm deliberately not looking at the bioRxiv queue as I don't want to have anything to do with this is in any way. Indeed, if bioRxiv post something that includes FOIA stuff I may quit