Chat message

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

1. 2021-06-20 16:42 Edward C. Holmes open
   He's totally lost it. His paper is clearly racist.
2. 2021-06-20 16:43 Kristian G. Andersen open
   Yup.
3. 2021-06-20 16:43 Kristian G. Andersen open
   Which was pointed out to him. Repeatedly. Yet - :man-shrugging:. In his words "I'll take the heat" (I pointed to out this wasn't about him, but :man-shrugging:)
4. 2021-06-20 16:48 Edward C. Holmes open
   Such a stupid thing to do. He could have raised these points without all the accusations.
5. 2021-06-20 16:49 Kristian G. Andersen
   Yup. And concluded - "It'd be really helpful if the samples were still available and full genomes could be produced". But no - he finishes on how this is a failure of science because the Chinese scientists are lying bastards.
6. 2021-06-20 16:50 Robert F. Garry open
   I think some of this is about "taking the heat" or at least forcing his way into the spotlight. He'll be a hero to DRASTIC and Alina - will this be a step too far for any of the rest of the Bloomshiters. Btwn JB and AC they are pretty much making a mockery of science. We'll know for sure when he starts making the rounds on Fox and Murdoch.
7. 2021-06-20 16:50 Kristian G. Andersen open
   Tone deaf. :notes:
8. 2021-06-20 16:50 Edward C. Holmes open
   I can't believe he is really that naive
9. 2021-06-20 16:51 Kristian G. Andersen open
   After this meeting, I honestly think something might be wrong with him. But I'm not going to speculate.

Full conversation →