Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.936 [SLACK_001150] · slack_pm:msg:09726

Date: 2021-06-08 14:37
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yeah, I agree - tricky though. Should we try to aim for a Zoom tomorrow or Thursday (Friday)? I think it would begood to touch base on what we have and where to go next

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-06-08 13:53 Robert F. Garry open

That's a helluva trick - why did I not learn this before?
2021-06-08 13:53 Kristian G. Andersen open

Works with Science too...
2021-06-08 13:53 Robert F. Garry open

Love it: "Yet Baltimore has effectively disavowed his characterization of the furin cleavage site. As with so many other claims made to support the lab leak theory, this "smoking gun" turns out to be mostly smoke."
2021-06-08 14:23 Edward C. Holmes open

I can't Zoom today - I've got a lot on. I think we were lucky not to write the response to Bloom but should turn the evidence doc into a proper paper outlining what we do and don't know.
2021-06-08 14:37 Kristian G. Andersen

Yeah, I agree - tricky though. Should we try to aim for a Zoom tomorrow or Thursday (Friday)? I think it would begood to touch base on what we have and where to go next
2021-06-08 14:42 Edward C. Holmes open

I could do tomorrow morning - something like 2 pm your time
2021-06-08 14:44 Edward C. Holmes open

Ditto for Friday
2021-06-08 15:01 Andrew Rambaut open

Let me know what time you decide - I can probably make it.
2021-06-08 15:20 Kristian G. Andersen open

2pm my time tomorrow

Full conversation →