Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.932 [SLACK_001146] · slack_pm:msg:09688

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yes, I'll email him back

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-06-07 17:16 Kristian G. Andersen open

Good to see Jason on it - and also with quotes from Mike. This is *very strictly* between us, but here's a snippetfrom an email exchange I had with Mike earlier today...I say we get him to sign our letter... [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-06-07 at 5.15.02 PM.png]
2021-06-07 17:26 Edward C. Holmes open

Huge!
2021-06-07 17:27 Edward C. Holmes open

He's just emailed me
2021-06-07 17:30 Kristian G. Andersen open

I guess he just emailed all of us... That's nice - I can fully forgive scientists who realize they were wrong, admit it,and then move on. I'm not surprised Mike would be that person out of the lot. He still owes me a beer. Eddie, do you want to email him back since I just talked to him on a separate thread?
2021-06-07 17:31 Edward C. Holmes

Yes, I'll email him back
2021-06-07 17:33 Robert F. Garry open

I sent a quick ten worder - please say more Eddie...
2021-06-07 17:55 Edward C. Holmes open

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2021/jun/08/blacklist-claim-australian-research-council-admits-scanning-applicants-for-sensitivities-china-links
2021-06-07 18:06 Kristian G. Andersen open

Dang! WTF?
2021-06-07 18:09 Edward C. Holmes open

WTF indeed. Thanks everyone! Hopefully it's the AI stuff they are mainly worried about.