Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.914 [SLACK_001128] · slack_pm:msg:09482

Date: 2021-06-03 20:35
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Edward C. Holmes

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Fair point. Did you get this? Is it a trap? Might help get some right-wing credit. I feel that I should be open. What doyou think? [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-06-04 at 1.33.23 pm.png]

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-06-03 19:31 Kristian G. Andersen open

Just filing here as reference if we later need all of Tony's emails... Guess what, I once again didn't get a chance to look at the paper and I still need to focus on grants for the rest of theevening. I swear, tomorrow will be the day. [shared file(s): leopold-nih-foia-anthony-fauci-emails.pdf]
2021-06-03 20:00 Edward C. Holmes open

I'm in the same boat Kristian. Plus I think I am going slowly mad.
2021-06-03 20:22 Kristian G. Andersen open

Slowly?
2021-06-03 20:35 Edward C. Holmes

Fair point. Did you get this? Is it a trap? Might help get some right-wing credit. I feel that I should be open. What doyou think? [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-06-04 at 1.33.23 pm.png]
2021-06-03 20:37 Kristian G. Andersen open

Nope, didn't get that - Bob would be the person to answer if this is a trap... I don't think so though.
2021-06-03 20:38 Edward C. Holmes open

Yes, I think it's legit. Would you do it?
2021-06-03 20:47 Kristian G. Andersen open

SLACK_001129 I think probably yes, but need @Robert Garry's eyes on it - he knows all this stuff :wink:
2021-06-03 20:47 Edward C. Holmes open

a1:

Full conversation →