COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, pp.907-908 [SLACK_001121] · slack_pm:msg:09422

Page text: p.907, p.908 · original PDF

Date
2021-06-02 16:09
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

We all did - and do. Doesn't matter - too good a conspiracy. SLACK_001122 But, that also doesn't matter - it's all about the long-game and hence that paper is important. I'll get back to ittomorrow.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-06-02 15:59 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Warning or Wanted? I'm confused. [shared file(s): image.png]
  2. 2021-06-02 16:05 Edward C. Holmes open
    I think it should read "Warning: avoid this man at all costs"
  3. 2021-06-02 16:05 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Better than "Wanted", I guess...
  4. 2021-06-02 16:07 Edward C. Holmes open
    What a mess. Fauci did everything right.
  5. 2021-06-02 16:09 Kristian G. Andersen
    We all did - and do. Doesn't matter - too good a conspiracy. SLACK_001122 But, that also doesn't matter - it's all about the long-game and hence that paper is important. I'll get back to ittomorrow.
  6. 2021-06-02 16:09 Edward C. Holmes open
    I see Trevor is pontificating again He is forgetting all the zoonotic IAVs
  7. 2021-06-02 16:09 Edward C. Holmes open
    I like the Fauci ink blot test at the bottom: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-57336280
  8. 2021-06-02 16:09 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Hah, yeah, that ink blot test is :100: spot on. These emails fit whatever narrative you believe.
  9. 2021-06-02 16:09 Kristian G. Andersen open
    I don't know what Trevor is on about - the first tweet in that thread is outright false: "We now have mainstream scientific opinions that largely range between "lab leak can be dismissed" and "both zoonosis and lab leak are viable" Eh, no - nobody said we could dismiss anything. We said it was unsupported and highly unlikely. Also, we're not talking about uninformed priors here - there's _actual_ data, which Trevor knows well.

Full conversation →