Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.903 [SLACK_001117] · slack_pm:msg:09370

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Kristian you didn't just tell the public - you used an advanced form of mind control over scientists, journalists and lay people alike.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-06-01 14:30 Edward C. Holmes open

eDim has started already
2021-06-01 14:36 Kristian G. Andersen open

I'll let them go down this path - going to look so dumb later on. "Telling the public one thing, but secretly believing it's engineered". Love it.
2021-06-01 14:49 Robert F. Garry open

eDim [shared file(s): image.png]
2021-06-01 14:53 Kristian G. Andersen open

Pure garbage - apparently these folks have never heard about "science". Not too surprising.
2021-06-01 14:53 Robert F. Garry

Kristian you didn't just tell the public - you used an advanced form of mind control over scientists, journalists and lay people alike.
2021-06-01 14:54 Kristian G. Andersen open

Mind control. My specialty.
2021-06-01 14:54 Robert F. Garry open

So, I guess there was some sort of "conspiracy."
2021-06-01 14:56 Kristian G. Andersen open

Just look at the word choice from eDim - "close coordination". Such garbage - but it's worthwhile having them all godown this path because it'll show how absolutely absurd their efforts are - pure conspiracy. Then the actual explanation of "hypotheses, data, analyses, updated hypotheses" will become known and shows totally normal science being done. Same with Shi's explanation for how RaTG13 was indeed 4991, the sample...
2021-06-01 15:06 Kristian G. Andersen open

This guy gets it... https://twitter.com/_Sernie_Banders/with_replies [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-06-01 at 3.04.48 PM.png, Screen Shot 2021-06-01 at 3.05.07 PM.png]