Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.902 [SLACK_001116] · slack_pm:msg:09356

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I'm pretty sure the TFHs will take this to mean the CCP paid us off. I'll let them go down that rabbit hole.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-06-01 13:10 Edward C. Holmes open

Oh, I think we are showing up...
2021-06-01 13:12 Kristian G. Andersen open

Oh, we definitely are! Could have been better worded, but I have no problems with this being public.
2021-06-01 13:12 Kristian G. Andersen open

Clearly showed we took the lab leak very seriously - and decided there was nothing to it.
2021-06-01 13:13 Edward C. Holmes open

You can guarantee that others will spin it differently
2021-06-01 13:13 Kristian G. Andersen

I'm pretty sure the TFHs will take this to mean the CCP paid us off. I'll let them go down that rabbit hole.
2021-06-01 13:15 Edward C. Holmes open

I hope you used Butt Lesion to Tony
2021-06-01 13:17 Kristian G. Andersen open

I didn't, unfortunately - lemme just check what other emails I had out to him (I think these are the two).
2021-06-01 13:17 Edward C. Holmes open

And I thought they had run out of rabbit holes :zany_face: https://twitter.com/sciencecohen/status/1399821336487227393?s=12
2021-06-01 13:19 Kristian G. Andersen open

Just missed the cutoff date I think... [shared file(s): RE: Phone call]