Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.873 [SLACK_001087] · slack_pm:msg:09046

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Nope - still the same. Total gibberish. I love the subject line of that email - "Ugh" indeed.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-25 17:31 Edward C. Holmes open

I think that wins the most deranged article of the whole pandemic. Published in The Australian.
2021-05-25 17:38 Kristian G. Andersen open

Is there something wrong with the formatting? Because _*none*_ of this makes any sense whatsoever.
2021-05-25 17:39 Kristian G. Andersen open

It honestly reads like a really terrible Google translation of a Chinese document. Hmmmm :thinking_face:
2021-05-25 17:43 Edward C. Holmes open

It's missing the pictures. Try this: [shared file(s): Re Ugh.pdf]
2021-05-25 17:44 Kristian G. Andersen

Nope - still the same. Total gibberish. I love the subject line of that email - "Ugh" indeed.
2021-05-25 17:48 Edward C. Holmes open

The story seems to be that an editor of Virologica Sinica who worked at the USAMRID once went to WIV for a journal meeting. I particularly like the bit about Jens Kuhn also being on the editorial board....if Jens were in chargeof WIV they'd have all their viruses beautifully classified by now.
2021-05-25 17:50 Edward C. Holmes open

Sharri is totally deranged. Off the scale.
2021-05-25 17:52 Kristian G. Andersen open

Completely off the scale. How this gets past editorial, I just don't understand - they must be desperate for anything lab leak related.
2021-05-25 17:57 Edward C. Holmes open

I would have thought China would be delighted to see USAMRID mentioned.