Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.850 [SLACK_001064] · slack_pm:msg:08832

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

@Kristian Andersen Yeah - although, that is some stiff competition from the US... At least we do 'bad' pretty well.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-21 05:49 Kristian G. Andersen open

Hah - Stanford. Mike Levitt, David Relman, Jay Bhattacharya, Scott Atlas, John Ioannidis.... Is there a university that has done worse during this pandemic?
2021-05-21 05:57 Robert F. Garry open

They should shutter it for the good of us all.
2021-05-21 05:57 Robert F. Garry open

I see why Nathan Wolfe fit in there so well.
2021-05-21 06:01 Andrew Rambaut open

@Kristian Andersen Oxford has a few bad eggs...
2021-05-21 06:02 Kristian G. Andersen

@Kristian Andersen Yeah - although, that is some stiff competition from the US... At least we do 'bad' pretty well.
2021-05-21 06:05 Kristian G. Andersen open

Absence any data whatsoever, Relman's piece might be considered quite balanced. By now, it's uninformed and naive.
2021-05-21 06:13 Andrew Rambaut open

@Kristian Andersen You do bad the best
2021-05-21 06:47 Kristian G. Andersen open

Eddie, I assume this is the journo you have been talking to? He's a little all over the place, but a story to look at the stuff we're currently missing is kinda important. I'm reluctant to take interviews at the moment, but should I talk to this guy based on your conversations? [shared file(s): China-based journalist with The Guardian reaching out]