COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.810 [SLACK_001024] · slack_pm:msg:08449

Page text: p.810 · original PDF

Date
2021-05-14 06:56
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Evidence document - yup! I was planning on working on it in response to David anyway, so I'll spend some time in asummary we can then build on.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-05-14 06:56 Kristian G. Andersen
    Evidence document - yup! I was planning on working on it in response to David anyway, so I'll spend some time in asummary we can then build on.
  2. 2021-05-14 07:00 Andrew Rambaut open
    Do we want to give it to David at this stage?
  3. 2021-05-14 07:02 Kristian G. Andersen open
    No I don't think so - but we can pull out a few of the "best hits" and include in the email reply to him.
  4. 2021-05-14 07:03 Kristian G. Andersen open
    I was planning on doing a Twitter thread based on it too so we have somewhere to point to - I have found this to beexceptionally useful.
  5. 2021-05-14 07:21 Robert F. Garry open
    Just throwing this out: One way to break a summary down is: 1. evidence for natural origin 2. evidence against lab origin or some variation of this.

Full conversation →