Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.801 [SLACK_001015] · slack_pm:msg:08334

Date: 2021-05-13 14:57
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker: Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

What do you think about the idea of not explicitly addressing this at the Bloom letter but just as a statement about the risk of focusing on lab escape and missing the big fact that we are going to have another pandemic if we don't sort the animal exposure issue.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-13 14:57 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, Happi for sure
2021-05-13 14:57 Kristian G. Andersen open

Mosoka Fallah
2021-05-13 14:57 Kristian G. Andersen open

Need Asia
2021-05-13 14:57 Edward C. Holmes open

Kanta Subbarao would sign
2021-05-13 14:57 Andrew Rambaut

What do you think about the idea of not explicitly addressing this at the Bloom letter but just as a statement about the risk of focusing on lab escape and missing the big fact that we are going to have another pandemic if we don't sort the animal exposure issue.
2021-05-13 14:57 Andrew Rambaut open

Malik
2021-05-13 14:57 Kristian G. Andersen open

Definitely - don't want tit for tat
2021-05-13 14:58 Andrew Rambaut open

Yi Guan
2021-05-13 14:58 Robert F. Garry open

The folks from this letter all strong: https://www.ajtmh.org/view/journals/tpmd/103/3/article-p955.xml

Full conversation →