Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.800 [SLACK_001014] · slack_pm:msg:08316

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

@Kristian Andersen Yeah - I need to look again. But I doubt Oli would be too gungho about it - he is the most sceptical of all of us.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-13 14:49 Andrew Rambaut open

@Kristian Andersen No - not more transmissible (IRRC) - just that it was transmitting faster (in the environment itwas in).
2021-05-13 14:49 Andrew Rambaut open

Oli might join it - he liked the snippet I sent him.
2021-05-13 14:50 Kristian G. Andersen open

@Kristian Andersen Hmmm, that was not how I read it (I remember them looking at those separately by splitting out immune evasion and inherent transmission - but I need to look again).
2021-05-13 14:51 Kristian G. Andersen open

It'd be great to have Oli on. Aris too? Do you know him? He seems very insightful.
2021-05-13 14:51 Andrew Rambaut

@Kristian Andersen Yeah - I need to look again. But I doubt Oli would be too gungho about it - he is the most sceptical of all of us.
2021-05-13 14:51 Andrew Rambaut open

I know Aris
2021-05-13 14:51 Kristian G. Andersen open

@Kristian Andersen Just a bit :wink:
2021-05-13 14:52 Andrew Rambaut open

David Robertson would be in too
2021-05-13 14:53 Edward C. Holmes open

Stuart Neil perhaps as well.