Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.783 [SLACK_000997] · slack_pm:msg:08161

Date: 2021-05-11 22:32
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Edward C. Holmes

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Somewhere I would add something like "completely misrepresents the remit and outcomes of the WHO report and presents a hopelessly naive plan of the next steps"

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-11 22:24 Edward C. Holmes open

I'm not replying. Not a chance.
2021-05-11 22:25 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, totally fair
2021-05-11 22:29 Kristian G. Andersen open

What's the best single (short) sentence to describe the letter? "biased opinion piece ignoring all available data,presenting a false balance of available evidence". Any better?
2021-05-11 22:30 Kristian G. Andersen open

The bigger problem, which is not in that sentence - it's hopelessly naive and uninformed...
2021-05-11 22:32 Edward C. Holmes

Somewhere I would add something like "completely misrepresents the remit and outcomes of the WHO report and presents a hopelessly naive plan of the next steps"
2021-05-11 22:34 Edward C. Holmes open

For the stupid GIPA court case I'm meant to avoid getting involved in online debates.
2021-05-11 22:34 Kristian G. Andersen open

Probably better for your own health to be honest... :wink:
2021-05-11 22:35 Edward C. Holmes open

It is!! I take blood pressure meds as it is.
2021-05-11 22:36 Kristian G. Andersen open

Beer for me.

Full conversation →