Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.747 [SLACK_000961] · slack_pm:msg:07822

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Secrets of peer review: https://www.minervanett.no/angus-dalgleish-birger-sorensen-coronavirus/the-fight-for-a-controversial-article/362519

Links shared

other https://www.minervanett.no/angus-dalgleish-birger-sorensen-coronavirus/the-fight-for-a-controversial-article/362519

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-04 08:36 Robert F. Garry

Secrets of peer review: https://www.minervanett.no/angus-dalgleish-birger-sorensen-coronavirus/the-fight-for-a-controversial-article/362519
2021-05-04 08:55 Kristian G. Andersen open

Aaaaahahahaha, "The authors suspect foul play and political considerations". Nope - but as I said, "Andersen last week told Sky news that Sørensen's and Dalgleish's work was "complete nonsense, unintelligible, and not evenremotely scientific - leading the authors to make unfounded and unsupported conclusions about the origin ofSARS-CoV-2""
2021-05-04 08:55 Kristian G. Andersen open

Playing the victim - they're good at that.
2021-05-04 09:04 Robert F. Garry open

Yes - they are all aggrieved parties - especially Alina. Her nonsense [can't assemble RatG13, pangoviruses; SC2 perfectly adapted etc] not better than Sørensen's and Dalgleish's "work." Journalists supporting this crap are culpable.