COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.724 · slack_pm:msg:07592

Page text: p.724 · original PDF

Date
2021-04-21 08:43 (hour precision)
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Robert F. Garry

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

https://www.unibas.ch/en/News-Events/News/Uni-Research/Conspiracy-theories-and-cogn...]9-pandemic.html?pk_ campaign=UN_20210407_Verschwoerungstheorien

Links shared

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-04-21 08:43 Robert F. Garry open
    Timely - since Alina is directing more BS at @Eddie Holmes new pango paper - who would have thought pangos could carry more than one respiratory pathogen? Pretty sure this in more Alina bullying - guessing she sent a new round of letters to PLOS and Nature. @Kristian Andersen answered this on virological. *Vegard Eldholm & OlaB Brynildsrud* _ Norwegian Institute of Public Health_ also weighed in. The horse is dead, but Alina keeps beating it.PLOS should do more than just say the data is ok - it should call out the Alina crap.
  2. 2021-04-21 08:43 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Probably just need to reassemble the virus genomes from the provided data - happy to do it @Andrew Rambaut
  3. 2021-04-21 08:43 Robert F. Garry open
    Rossana (Yuri's "co=pilot") too - make no mistake RS is accusing us (PO authors) of malfeasance. [shared file(s): image.png, image.png]
  4. 2021-04-21 08:43 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Idiots. Plain and simple.
  5. 2021-04-21 08:43 Robert F. Garry
    https://www.unibas.ch/en/News-Events/News/Uni-Research/Conspiracy-theories-and-cogn...]9-pandemic.html?pk_ campaign=UN_20210407_Verschwoerungstheorien
  6. 2021-04-21 08:43 Robert F. Garry open
    Turns out most people are idiots. [shared file(s): image.png]
  7. 2021-04-21 08:43 Robert F. Garry open
    Or they have been mislead by our "leaders."
  8. 2021-04-21 08:43 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Not surprised by this - and honestly, polling scientists on the first two questions, I'm not sure it would change much.
  9. 2021-04-21 08:43 Robert F. Garry open
    Sadly - you are likely correct. Should point them to your pinned tweet. Also - this was in Switzerland and Germany.US public much more skewed. Start off with all Trump voters 46% in category 1.

Full conversation →