COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.706 [SLACK_000920] · slack_pm:msg:07404

Page text: p.706 · original PDF

Date
2021-04-15 06:56
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Robert F. Garry
Topics
Media strategy and public messaging

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Same sad story repeats. https://www.cnet.com/features/how-the-coronavirus-origin-story-is-being-rewritten-by-a-guerrilla-twitter-group/#ftag=COS-05-10aaa0j

Links shared

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-04-15 06:52 Kristian G. Andersen open
    The WMDs! The WMDs - they found them!!
  2. 2021-04-15 06:56 Robert F. Garry
    Same sad story repeats. https://www.cnet.com/features/how-the-coronavirus-origin-story-is-being-rewritten-by-a-guerrilla-twitter-group/#ftag=COS-05-10aaa0j
  3. 2021-04-15 06:59 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Reddit said it well - "The COVID19 subreddit removed Drastic content because it does not class the group as "reputable authors with relevant expertise.""
  4. 2021-04-15 07:22 Edward C. Holmes open
    What a little shit that Jackson Ryan is. I'm going to complain about this.
  5. 2021-04-15 07:31 Robert F. Garry open
    "Holmes, the virologist at the University of Sydney, has collaborated closely with researchers in China and co-authored a highly cited Nature Medicine paper supporting the natural origin theory in March 2020. Bostickson has dubbed him a "Chinese puppet," and others have suggested that Holmes, with researchers working at the Wuhan Institute of Virology including Shi Zhengli, conspired to keep the origins of the pandemic a secret. Holmes has blocked many of the Drastic members on Twitter because member's tweets have descended into personal attacks." Well this is in fact shit. Ryan is from Sydney right?
  6. 2021-04-15 07:32 Robert F. Garry open
    It's hard to count the number of journalistic ethical standards this violates.

Full conversation →