Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.683 [SLACK_000897] · slack_pm:msg:07166

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

They should have said Forensic Bioinformatics Investigation (FBI).

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
They should have said Forensic Bioinformatics Investigation (FBI).	needs context	speaker_own	asserts

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

They should have said Forensic Bioinformatics Investigation (FBI).

needs context

speaker_own

asserts

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-04-06 18:52 Kristian G. Andersen open

To the DRASTIC paper - just wait until they look through the GTEx dataset from the Broad and identify the hundredsof Bostonians who died of Ebola :scream:
2021-04-06 18:55 Kristian G. Andersen open

Love this bit. Somebody might want to tell them about the RT-PCR enzymes used for RNASeq.... This is so dumb. I appreciate the enthusiasm, but they might want to talk to experts before doing this crap. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-04-06 at 6.54.07 PM.png]
2021-04-06 19:07 Edward C. Holmes open

Ha! Focanuba priceless.
2021-04-06 19:09 Kristian G. Andersen open

I might steal this line for a future paper though - "Using a forensic bioinformatics approach [...]". That's pretty good...
2021-04-06 19:11 Edward C. Holmes

They should have said Forensic Bioinformatics Investigation (FBI).
2021-04-06 19:11 Kristian G. Andersen open

Fuck yeah! Sorry, Focanuba!
2021-04-06 19:12 Edward C. Holmes open

It's Alcanopa. No worries.
2021-04-06 19:50 Kristian G. Andersen open

Argh, pomanycus!