Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.664 [SLACK_000878] · slack_pm:msg:06963

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Here's the WSJ editorial - let's hope the WSJ science reporting is [continues to be] better. [shared file(s): The Wuhan Whitewash - WSJ.pdf]

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-03-31 05:41 Robert F. Garry

Here's the WSJ editorial - let's hope the WSJ science reporting is [continues to be] better. [shared file(s): The Wuhan Whitewash - WSJ.pdf]
2021-03-31 06:10 Robert F. Garry open

Pompeo [shared file(s): image.png]
2021-03-31 06:38 Robert F. Garry open

Of course the early obfuscation by China on H2H transmission has nothing at all to do with origins. Nevertheless, Redfield brought this up on 60min, so I think the everTrumpers are coordinating a political strategy. Yes indeed -WHO did a piss-poor job not challenging the H2H misinformation, which I blame on bad science advisors. Likewise,the whole "it's not a airborne virus" crap from WHO is another abject failure. This is a place where Angie and Idiverge (she's more forgiving of WHO for not stating clearly that the virus is - well - a respiratory virus). I blame again WHO's "science" team that appears to have been populated by idiots. Unfortunately that "team" included LinaMoses who was in Geneva with GOARN advising. LM: a big fomite advocate as in in fomites are the main transmission route (see also Covidfaker). CDC under Redfield had numerous royal fuck-ups too, but much better topoint the finger at the CCP and "running dogs."