COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.650 · slack_pm:msg:06810

Page text: p.650 · original PDF

Date
2021-03-29 11:34 (hour precision)
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Edward C. Holmes

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Thanks! I will indeed.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-03-29 11:34 Edward C. Holmes open
    Can you send the Appendix Bob?
  2. 2021-03-29 11:34 Edward C. Holmes open
    Seems that China pushed back on the inclusion of the raccoon dog stuff...plus I think Daszak wants to include it inhis own Lancet report and get more of the glory!
  3. 2021-03-29 11:34 Robert F. Garry open
    Only if you deny where you got it :alien: [shared file(s): Annexes_20210328.pdf]
  4. 2021-03-29 11:34 Robert F. Garry open
    Annexes.
  5. 2021-03-29 11:34 Edward C. Holmes
    Thanks! I will indeed.
  6. 2021-03-29 11:34 Robert F. Garry open
    Dear ColleaguesYou are among thirty colleagues with an interest in the origin of SARS-CoV-2 who is receiving this email. Attached please find an Open Letter to the WHO with respect to the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the COVID pandemic. The purpose of the Open Letter is to request that the WHO acknowledge five facts that scientists agree on and which support the conclusion that an accidental laboratory-acquired infection was responsible for the COVID pandemic. The five undisputed facts are: COVID-19 wasn't smoldering in the community before the epidemic broke out, as was observed with previous coronavirus epidemics.Despite an intense search, neither the COVID virus, nor any close relative, has yet been found in nature, unlike prior natural zoonoses. The closest viral relative is from the laboratories of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, near theepicenter of the first cases. The COVID virus had little genetic diversity at the outset, unlike prior natural zoonoses. It was genetically pure, like a man-made vaccine. The COVID virus's powerful infectious trigger isn't found anywhere inits related viral group in nature but has been repeatedly inserted into viruses by laboratory scientists, including at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The virus was highly adapted for infection of people from the start, unlike prior natural zoonoses.I look forward to any comments you might have on this Open Letter, especially if there is scientific evidence (not speculation) which I have missed that should be included here or if you think something is misstated. IfI receiveyour comments before this is published I will make changes, if appropriate.Regards, Steve Steven Quay, MD, PhDDr. Quay WebsiteBreast Cancer TEDx Talk STAY SAFE #1 Amazon Medical Book SLACK_000865*ORCID 2-D iD*
  7. 2021-03-29 11:34 Robert F. Garry open
    Dr. Quay, I dispute each of your "facts."-
  8. 2021-03-29 11:34 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yeah, I got that too - complete nonsense from start to finish.
  9. 2021-03-29 11:34 Edward C. Holmes open
    First impression on the report is that they have pulled their punches and that this is going to go on for years which ishugely depressing.

Full conversation →