Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.563 [SLACK_000777] · slack_pm:msg:05880

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

@Kristian Andersen If a paper blooms on virological, is it really a paper?

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-03-03 12:49 Kristian G. Andersen open

Interesting - did not realize the UK genomics study is now the most accessed on Virological! More than the original genome - and our paper a distant third... [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-03-03 at 12.48.18 PM.png]
2021-03-03 13:08 Andrew Rambaut open

@Kristian Andersen Should really publish that.
2021-03-03 13:09 Kristian G. Andersen open

@Kristian Andersen Hah, yeah. Was on the phone with Oli this morning... Totally forgot there isn't actually a paper.
2021-03-03 13:40 Robert F. Garry

@Kristian Andersen If a paper blooms on virological, is it really a paper?
2021-03-03 13:48 Kristian G. Andersen open

@Kristian Andersen "is it really a paper" - better, "does it really need a paper"? IDK - I like these virological posts quite a bit...
2021-03-03 13:50 Kristian G. Andersen open

@Kristian Andersen In a world where fucking everything has to be in some flashy journal to count, nerding out on anonline forum, fiddling around with data, and geeking out on the science feel quite satisfactory. Plus, no editors orreviewers to deal with - just colleagues.
2021-03-03 13:56 Edward C. Holmes open

@Kristian Andersen We should lobby for it to be on PubMed.
2021-03-03 13:57 Kristian G. Andersen open

@Kristian Andersen Nah.