Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.561 [SLACK_000775] · slack_pm:msg:05854

Date: 2021-03-02 16:49
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Edward C. Holmes

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Am I right in thinking that there has been a marked lack of Twitter activity about Nature piece? I wonder if the authors were just embarrassed by it? There were some good replies to your tweet Kristian.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-03-02 16:49 Edward C. Holmes

Am I right in thinking that there has been a marked lack of Twitter activity about Nature piece? I wonder if the authors were just embarrassed by it? There were some good replies to your tweet Kristian.
2021-03-02 17:06 Kristian G. Andersen open

I think it's fair to say the authors are embarrassed - I know I would be. Emma hasn't really been much on Twitter asof late though.
2021-03-02 17:26 Edward C. Holmes open

What a bloody waste of time.
2021-03-02 17:26 Kristian G. Andersen open

This :point_down: [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-03-02 at 5.26.20 PM.png]
2021-03-02 17:27 Kristian G. Andersen open

Why in the WORLD they put that in, I don't understand.

Full conversation →