Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.548 [SLACK_000762] · slack_pm:msg:05711

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Agree, Betsy is pretty good, but I'm unclear about her motives on origins - I guess we'll see...

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-02-24 13:00 Kristian G. Andersen open

One question to the FOIA though - I _do_ think we need to make the reviews public as the emails make the Nature connection clear. The original version of the paper is still what's on Virological, correct?
2021-02-24 13:09 Edward C. Holmes open

I'm not sure we're allowed to do that because (i) they explicitly said that correspondence with the journal was excluded and (ii) we'll need get approval from Nature. But, that does raise an issue of what Nature will think. So,perhaps I should run all these emails by Nature now anyway?
2021-02-24 13:39 Robert F. Garry open

Just off the phone with Betsy McKay - actually pretty good - they are going to do a series on origins, but just starting. YEs - not a bad idea to run emails by Nature - nothing there that's really a problem - I'm OK with "The Nerd" - I'mowning it!
2021-02-24 13:42 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, might be worth popping this by Nature - questions will for sure be asked ("did they get rejected because their natural hypothesis wasn't supported well enough"? Quite the opposite.... Still pissed about it).
2021-02-24 13:43 Kristian G. Andersen

Agree, Betsy is pretty good, but I'm unclear about her motives on origins - I guess we'll see...