Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.524 [SLACK_000738] · slack_pm:msg:05463

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

AFAIK there is not a definite - or official - end to the CTD. No cysteine loop or other feature that would tie it off.

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
AFAIK there is not a definite - or official - end to the CTD.	own voice, substantive	speaker_own	asserts

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

AFAIK there is not a definite - or official - end to the CTD.

own voice, substantive

speaker_own

asserts

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-02-18 09:35 Andrew Rambaut open

@Robert Garry Some discussion in another place on where the RBD ends in SC2: is it 331N - 526G (what we had in Prox) or 527?
2021-02-18 09:51 Robert F. Garry open

331N to 526 or 527 is - what I would consider - the entire C-terminal Domain CTD. The RBD itself is a smaller loop within the CTD, which is actually a bit bigger than what we estimated in PO1 - so running about 414 to 506.
2021-02-18 10:00 Robert F. Garry

AFAIK there is not a definite - or official - end to the CTD. No cysteine loop or other feature that would tie it off.