Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.507 [SLACK_000721] · slack_pm:msg:05300

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Or they were weighed down some heavily by their prior assumptions that no amt of info would change their view.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-02-10 18:27 Robert F. Garry open

Awesome - brings back memories of the Am Soc Virol mtgs always held near one of the National Parks - my girls and I always did 3 weeks in the summer around the ASV mtgs.
2021-02-10 18:31 Robert F. Garry open

@Eddie Holmes Yuri, Alina and the other Drastic :clown_face:s licking their wounds. Problem with the WHO presseris not much science - the Cambo, Thai and Japan bat virus are a opportunity to counter some of the conspiracy theories with science.
2021-02-10 18:55 Kristian G. Andersen open

To Jesse's point - it's worth pointing out that "remaining agnostic" doesn't actually entail a 50/50 split of lab vsnature, but rather involves looking at data. He has not.
2021-02-10 19:23 Robert F. Garry open

Important point - the lab link proponents or "agnostics" have either not looked closely at the data or looked and did not have the background to comprehend.
2021-02-10 19:24 Robert F. Garry

Or they were weighed down some heavily by their prior assumptions that no amt of info would change their view.
2021-02-10 19:40 Edward C. Holmes open

@Eddie Holmes Totally agree. Stick to the science.
2021-02-10 19:40 Edward C. Holmes open

Agreed. Hopefully I'll get a debrief from Dominic soon.