Chat message
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.498 [SLACK_000712] · slack_pm:msg:05199
Page text: p.498 · original PDF
- Date
- 2021-02-08 05:34
- Type
- chat message · slack
- recipient
- Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
- speaker
- Andrew Rambaut
Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.
My thought is whether the initial samples came up as SARS and they quite reasonably cleared the market. They
would have taken samples from the animals (it is inconceivable they wouldn't). What maybe went wrong is that the animal samples came up negative. This is when they they realised it wasn't just animal exposure and it was circulating. So they suppressed the negative results (much easier than positive results). Then they got the environmental samples which presumably were just the result of the human cases and that was the best they coulddo.