Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.483 [SLACK_000697] · slack_pm:msg:05032

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

THis is the part in particular I do not like - [shared file(s): image.png]

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-02-05 07:46 Robert F. Garry open

Seriously Alina and Ebright https://twitter.com/Ayjchan/status/1357691160198807552 THis is garbage...
2021-02-05 07:52 Andrew Rambaut open

It isn't entirely wrong - I heard from someone else that they had got a paper to review from Nature and they said they weren't going to review it until the genome was released. Then Jeremy's tweet and Eddie persuading Zhang torelease it.
2021-02-05 07:52 Kristian G. Andersen open

The part about Nature is probably correct. The part involving "Ed" I'm sure isn't
2021-02-05 07:53 Kristian G. Andersen open

Instead of reading Twitter, watch this instead. https://youtu.be/lgGmYeAm0jk. It'll make you feel better.
2021-02-05 07:55 Robert F. Garry

THis is the part in particular I do not like - [shared file(s): image.png]
2021-02-05 07:58 Andrew Rambaut open

Yes - that is wrong.
2021-02-05 07:58 Kristian G. Andersen open

"They"
2021-02-05 07:59 Andrew Rambaut open

The embargo is just the standard, wait until we tell you to release it but give us an accession number.
2021-02-05 07:59 Andrew Rambaut open

And in the mean time George was pissing around with getting GISAID to setup something for them.