Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.461 [SLACK_000675] · slack_pm:msg:04785

Date: 2021-01-28 15:40
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Robert F. Garry

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Thanks Eddie. Here's another version - Gonna go with my own analysis since there are a couple of calls that Bloom2020 makes for interacting residues that are likely wrong, including importantly E484. Something to keep inmind for PO2 since we now have pretty good structures and the contact residues are more than the 6 we highlightedin PO1. [shared file(s): image.png]

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-01-28 15:31 Edward C. Holmes open

Thanks for doing this Bob. I hope to get more information from Weifeng soon.
2021-01-28 15:40 Robert F. Garry

Thanks Eddie. Here's another version - Gonna go with my own analysis since there are a couple of calls that Bloom2020 makes for interacting residues that are likely wrong, including importantly E484. Something to keep inmind for PO2 since we now have pretty good structures and the contact residues are more than the 6 we highlightedin PO1. [shared file(s): image.png]
2021-01-28 15:44 Robert F. Garry open

Looking forward to the Weifeng sequences. Will fill more gaps - I should be able to share a draft of "New sequences disprove conspiracy theories of a laboratory-based proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2" over the weekend. Also, and they seem to have made a lesser pick, I'm doing an interview for 60 Minutes Australia tomorrow. I'm assuming they are somewhat credible and I didn't stumble down some "Fox" hole.

Full conversation →