Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, pp.440-441 [SLACK_000654] · slack_pm:msg:04556

Date: 2021-01-23 11:37
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Robert F. Garry

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

And now that WE [not DRASTIC} have uncovered the actual plan, I'll see if I can get a back-channel message to Pompeo, Sen. Cotton and newly pardoned media genus Bannon. Seems like Tucker should want us on Fox for several episodes.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-01-23 11:30 Edward C. Holmes open

I think you nailed it Bob.
2021-01-23 11:33 Kristian G. Andersen open

I finally got a chance to read that c|net article - overall actually ok. Yes, too much false balance here, but I think hedid pretty well.
2021-01-23 11:37 Robert F. Garry

And now that WE [not DRASTIC} have uncovered the actual plan, I'll see if I can get a back-channel message to Pompeo, Sen. Cotton and newly pardoned media genus Bannon. Seems like Tucker should want us on Fox for several episodes.
2021-01-23 11:41 Kristian G. Andersen open

Latest data from Jordan on B.1.1.7 - signal starting to be pretty clear and that increase in transmission is really quite something. [shared file(s): Log_growth.png]
2021-01-23 11:45 Robert F. Garry open

Don't think this is classified, but I heard from a good source that B.1.351 is in Kuwait.

Full conversation →