Chat message

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

1. 2021-01-12 21:07 Kristian G. Andersen
   Yeah, let's see what you actually dig out of your email and then decide if we should 'leak' some of them or not. Isuspect yes, as we know they _will_ go public and they _will_ be quoted out of context. Much better to lightheartedsteal the thunder from all the buffoons.Btw all this recent evolution observed in SARS-CoV-2 really is a giant :middle_finger:to all the tinfoil hats out there.
2. 2021-01-12 21:09 Robert F. Garry open
   @Robert Garry *@channel Ruff draft:Introduction* SAR-CoV-2 variants carrying multiple mutations have emerged around the world. B.1.1.7 in the United Kingdom acquired 17 mutations, including 8 in spike (Rambaut et al., 2020). B.1.351 in South Africa (Pond et al., 2020) andP.1 in Brazil [ref] represent additional emerging variants with multiple mutations. Among other mutations, B.1.1.7and B.1.351 have deletions in spike. *Methods* The following sequences were included in this analysis:YP_009724390.1 surface glycoprotein [Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus AAP13441.1 S protein [SARS coronavirus Urbani]AAU04646.1 spike glycoprotein [Civet SARS CoV 007/2004]```QHR63300.2 spike glycoprotein [Bat coronavirus RaTG13]``` Spike amino acid sequences were aligned using Clustal Omega (Sievers et al., 2011).Figure 1. Amino acid alignment of SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, RatG13 BatCoV spikes. Only part of S2 is shown. Theremainder of the alignment does not have additional insertions or deletions. *Results* Divergence of the SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV2 appears to involve insertion of several short sequences in spike (Fig. 1). Except for the insertion that generated the furin cleavage site, the RatG13 BatCov spike has each of the SARS-CoV2 spike insertions. This suggests that a common ancestor of SARS-CoV2 and RatG13 BatCov had already obtained these insertions. The spike of SARS-CoV of civets does not have any insertions or deletions relative to spike of human SARS-CoV (not shown). The spikes of B.1.1.7 variants have deletions of amino acids H69 and V70. The spikes of B.1.351 variants have adeletion at amino acid Y145 and consecutive deletions at amino acids L241, L242 and A243. The deletions in these variants correspond to the apparent insertions that have occurred in the SARS-CoV-2 spike relative to the SARS-CoV spike. Thus, deletions in these emerging variants are in or near sequences that were inserted after the divergence of the embecovirus lineage that produced SARS-CoV-2 from the lineage that produced SARS-CoV.An insertion in or near the coding sequence for amino acid E484 of SARS-CoV-2 spike can also be inferred by the alignment of SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV2 and RatG13-Bat CoV spikes. E484K is one of several mutations of known biological importance that is present in the B.1.351 and P1 lineages of emerging SARS-CoV2 variants. *Discussion* The generation of insertions or deletions (indels) in or near the furin cleavage site is a frequent occurrence during coronavirus evolution (Gallaher and Garry, 2020). Passage of SARS-CoV-2 in Vero cells can result in deletion ofeither the furin cleavage site or a sequence immediately adjacent to it [ref]. Deletions in the spike genes of recent emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants occur preferentially in mutational hotspots that have generated insertions during embecovirus evolution. Another insertion adds amino acid E484 that is subject to further mutation during extendedhuman-to-human passage, and which may impart enhanced fitness and/or immune escape.A caveat of the current analysis is that the amino acid alignments are not intended to precisely represent the underlying nucleotide alignments. A previous analysis suggested that the insertion generating the furin cleavage sitein SARS-CoV-2 spike is out-of-frame. The molecular mechanism(s) that generated the insertions present inSASR-CoV-2 spike cannot be determined by sequence analysis. Although coronaviruses have a proof-readingapparatus, their genomes remain subject to recombination as well as copy-choice transcriptional errors [refs].*Conclusions*It will be important to elucidate genomic features that favor indel formation and to define molecular processesoccuring during coronavirus genome replication that produce indels.
3. 2021-01-12 21:13 Robert F. Garry open
   @Kristian Andersen the ruff draft I just posted might be a good place for you to insert a few sentences of some pointed language for the tinfoil hats.
4. 2021-01-12 21:16 Kristian G. Andersen open
   I'll take a look Bob - I assume on the GDoc? @Eddie Holmes - I forgot to mention - very interesting about the pangos! Looking forward to seeing some of that data (that'll be another :middle_finger:)
5. 2021-01-12 21:19 Robert F. Garry open
   Yes - that would be good if you want to post a Gdoc. Please use the edited version - the paste didn't go well the first time.

Full conversation →