Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.368 [SLACK_000582] · slack_pm:msg:03839

Date: 2021-01-08 07:57
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Robert F. Garry

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yeah - very disappointing. When I see a good response to all of the B.1.1.7 mutations and plus the B.351 [including Erik] mutations then I'll say no need for a v2.0.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-01-08 07:34 Robert F. Garry open

https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/01/08/2155442/0/en/An-In-Vitro-Study-Sh[...]ation-Associatedwith-Rapid-Transmission.html?source=email Good to see but unfortunately Nelly is not the most concerning....
2021-01-08 07:41 Kristian G. Andersen open

Pretty much a useless study IMO - I don't think anybody had concerns about Nelly when it comes to immunity. It's all the other mutations...
2021-01-08 07:57 Robert F. Garry

Yeah - very disappointing. When I see a good response to all of the B.1.1.7 mutations and plus the B.351 [including Erik] mutations then I'll say no need for a v2.0.
2021-01-08 08:05 Kristian G. Andersen open

Gotta say though - I called it on Nelly a while back... :man_in_business_suit_levitating:(although I'm still very surprised by the magnitude of the effect seen in B.1.1.7). [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-01-08 at 8.03.38AM.png]

Full conversation →