COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, pp.359-360 [SLACK_000573] · slack_pm:msg:03751

Page text: p.359, p.360 · original PDF

Date
2021-01-05 01:03
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker
Andrew Rambaut
Topics
China relations and data accessTesting and surveillanceFurin cleavage site and molecular features

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

James thinks he is on to something that explains everything: ```Evolutionists in the know: Australia, S Korea, China all use the Beijing test - no spike protein per their protocol? https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2020/06/post-market-validation-of-the-beijing-genomics-institute-bgi-sars-cov-2-real-time-pcr-platform.pdfIf so, that might explain the discrepancies... concluding that "we never could have gotten our arms around this because variants" will not fly."Not knowing enough to exclude primer sites that are evolutionarily labile" - yes, I'd buy that.IF Oz, S. Korea & China all used conserved primer target sites and other nations did not, it's a disgrace.CDC boasts on their website that they controlled SARS w/accurate testing and contact tracing.We still have no viable reliable testing program???```

Links shared

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

StatementGradeAttributionStance
James thinks he is on to something that explains everything: ```Evolutionists in the know: Australia, S Korea, China all use the Beijing test - no spike protein per their protocol? https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2020/06/post-market-validation-of-the-beijing-genomics-institute-bgi-sars-cov-2-real-time-pcr-platform.pdfIf so, that might explain the discrepancies... concluding that "we never could have gotten our arms around this because variants" will not fly."Not knowing enough to exclude primer sites that are evolutionarily labile" - yes, I'd buy that.IF Oz, S. quoted / not their view quoted_external sentence carries quotation marks questions
Korea & China all used conserved primer target sites and other nations did not, it's a disgrace.CDC boasts on their website that they controlled SARS w/accurate testing and contact tracing.We still have no viable reliable testing program???``` needs context speaker_own questions

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-01-05 01:03 Andrew Rambaut
    James thinks he is on to something that explains everything: ```Evolutionists in the know: Australia, S Korea, China all use the Beijing test - no spike protein per their protocol? https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2020/06/post-market-validation-of-the-beijing-genomics-institute-bgi-sars-cov-2-real-time-pcr-platform.pdfIf so, that might explain the discrepancies... concluding that "we never could have gotten our arms around this because variants" will not fly."Not knowing enough to exclude primer sites that are evolutionarily labile" - yes, I'd buy that.IF Oz, S. Korea & China all used conserved primer target sites and other nations did not, it's a disgrace.CDC boasts on their website that they controlled SARS w/accurate testing and contact tracing.We still have no viable reliable testing program???```
  2. 2021-01-05 01:07 Andrew Rambaut open
    The UK uses lots of tests with different targets. No sign of any issues other than the S gene dropout due to 69-70
  3. 2021-01-05 01:08 Andrew Rambaut open
    And the positive rate has been rising as the S drop-out rate has been rising

Full conversation →