Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.355 [SLACK_000569] · slack_pm:msg:03718

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Also, more of this kind of bs. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-01-03 at 4.23.33 PM.png]

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-01-03 15:58 Edward C. Holmes open

It's a never-ending amazement to see how completely bonkers some people are. This was the link in one of the replies to Jeremy's tweet: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-[...]orld-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/
2021-01-03 16:23 Kristian G. Andersen open

Why is it that the dumber people are, the more time they have to spend on the internet?
2021-01-03 16:25 Kristian G. Andersen

Also, more of this kind of bs. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-01-03 at 4.23.33 PM.png]
2021-01-03 16:46 Edward C. Holmes open

Yes, I saw this in the Daily Mail: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9106951/Lab-leak-credible-source-coronavirus-outbreak-says-government-official.html I wonder who this whistle blower is? Had better be more convincing than the last one.
2021-01-03 16:55 Edward C. Holmes open

Is this timed for the Georgia vote?
2021-01-03 17:12 Edward C. Holmes open

@Kristian Andersen I'd reply to that journo saying that you'd love to hear what this alleged whistleblower has to say and will comment afterwards.
2021-01-03 17:17 Robert F. Garry open

@Eddie Holmes Also, please send the cock-heads and pangolying idiots!