COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.325 [SLACK_000539] · slack_pm:msg:03420

Page text: p.325 · original PDF

Date
2020-12-19 10:45
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker
Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

486 is a contact residue, right? Crops up in the Dutch mink.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2020-12-19 08:04 Andrew Rambaut open
    South African N501Y lineage also has E484K but not much else I think. It has a very long unsampled branch with some USA ones as an outgroup. So no real evidence of a big bunch of mutations happening together.
  2. 2020-12-19 08:50 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Andrew, what's the best representative sequence for the UK lineage? All on GISAID?
  3. 2020-12-19 09:20 Andrew Rambaut open
    Actually the earliest one is a pretty good one: `England/MILK-9E05B3/2020|2020-09-20`
  4. 2020-12-19 09:55 Kristian G. Andersen open
    That additional mutation in the South African lineage is quite interesting - E484K is a flip of charge and K is novel inthis position across all the CoVs. @Robert Garry - any chance you can please take a look at that mutation to see ifyou might have any insights? The mutation has popped up a few times independently across the tree.
  5. 2020-12-19 10:45 Andrew Rambaut
    486 is a contact residue, right? Crops up in the Dutch mink.
  6. 2020-12-19 10:52 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yup - it's F in SC2, but L in SC1 and many of the bat viruses (I believe also L in the mink?)
  7. 2020-12-19 10:58 Andrew Rambaut open
    yup
  8. 2020-12-19 11:01 Kristian G. Andersen open
    I pinged Andrew Ward this morning to see if he could get one of his structural guys to take a close look at all of this -I'm sure you're already doing it too, but good to get a bunch of eyes on this. What's interesting about the SA link is that if we're really seeing this explosive growth, then it's down to N501Y and not all the other mutations. Which seems a little strange to me.
  9. 2020-12-19 11:02 Kristian G. Andersen open
    (as in - probably not N501Y alone, but N501Y with some other 'contextual' mutations)

Full conversation →