COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.311 [SLACK_000525] · slack_pm:msg:03261

Page text: p.311 · original PDF

Date
2020-12-14 09:44
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker
Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

This is the set of mutations that are unique to this cluster: [shared file(s): image.png]

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2020-12-14 09:35 Andrew Rambaut open
    However - and this is what really interests me is the 14 mutations and 3 deletions in one short (in time) branch. Ithink this must be the result of transmission from a chronic infection.
  2. 2020-12-14 09:39 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Thanks Andrew for the background - that's very interesting (and I'll keep this to this channel for now). It's great tohear that the UK now have systems in place to even detect "mutations of potential interest" - what it means isobviously a much longer affair.I get annoyed with all the communication that's completely dug in - "it's no issue at all" and "OMG it's mutating". Canwe just agree that the truth is somewhere in-between and that it always takes time to figure out?
  3. 2020-12-14 09:40 Kristian G. Andersen open
    As for chronic infection - I can totally believe that. Here's a case we recently picked up - seven month of SARS2 infection with negative PCRs in-between. Sky high titers when picked up in late October (6 months after infection -he remained positive into December). [shared file(s): fake-reinfection.pdf]
  4. 2020-12-14 09:42 Andrew Rambaut open
    I am normally fairly relaxed about RBD mutations - sure they happen and they may have antigenic effects but we can be pretty sure that they are not being antigenically selected for because there isn't enough standing immunity (inmost places) or vaccination yet. BUT... this chronic infection scenario worries me because it may well have selected for escape from the immune response raised by the wild type virus (and thus the vaccine). And now it is circulating widely.
  5. 2020-12-14 09:44 Andrew Rambaut
    This is the set of mutations that are unique to this cluster: [shared file(s): image.png]
  6. 2020-12-14 09:44 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yes, agreed. Although reinfections also a concern here - I'm worried about selection in e.g., healthcare settings.Mink transmission also a concern here.My default is always "probably not an issue", but SARS2 really does appear to be pretty 'adaptable' and there's ALOT of transmission going on.
  7. 2020-12-14 09:44 Andrew Rambaut open
    Here is the tree... [shared file(s): Kent_N501Y_836.ml_annotated_collapsed_tree.pdf]
  8. 2020-12-14 09:44 Kristian G. Andersen open
    That's A LOT of mutations - all in one 'jump'?
  9. 2020-12-14 09:45 Andrew Rambaut open
    There is one intermediate with some of the mutations... hence thought of a chronic shedder

Full conversation →