COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.260 [SLACK_000474] · slack_pm:msg:02714

Page text: p.260 · original PDF

Date
2020-11-17 05:58
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Robert F. Garry

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Alina: "Does anyone believe me yet that we need to see what exactly were the communications between the authors, journals, and peer reviewers since January?" There are valid arguments for and against open peer review. What Alina is suggesting goes way beyond open peer review however and implies that the journals are corrupt. She would like to set the rules, but she can't and shouldn't.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2020-11-17 05:58 Robert F. Garry
    Alina: "Does anyone believe me yet that we need to see what exactly were the communications between the authors, journals, and peer reviewers since January?" There are valid arguments for and against open peer review. What Alina is suggesting goes way beyond open peer review however and implies that the journals are corrupt. She would like to set the rules, but she can't and shouldn't.

Full conversation →