A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
@Kristian Andersen I just got this: Hello Professor Holmes My name is Thomas Crow. I'm a freelance science writer who writes for Crikey, Scitech's Particle website and NewZealand eScience Institute. SLACK_000438 I'm looking at writing a story on how they've recently updated the RaTG13 genome in the NCBI gene bank:https//www.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/nuccore/MN996532and Pete Doherty recommended you as a good person to contact about this.I saw some people claiming on Twitter that this is evidence that the virus was not naturally occurring and that it wasmanufactured in a lab. I don't know enough about reading genomes to parse this update, but I was wondering if you could have a look and let me know if there's any significance you can see (apparently there's been a couple of base pair changes).I don't expect you to read through the whole thing! I'd just like your take on anything that jumps out at you or if you have a possible explanation as to why the gene bank was updated. I think it would be good to address this by anexpert before rumours start picking up.Thank you.Thomas CrowScience Writer_witterLinkedIn
-
I've no interest in the story, but I see they updated RaTG13 on GenBank. Anything significant?
-
Bloody good timing. Not.
-
2020-10-20 19:09
Edward C. Holmes
Only appears to be a few base changes by the look of it.
-
They're writing about an article about a sequence being updated on Genbank? Fuck me. There is NO significance to this and it's not worth commenting on - ANYBODY who does this type of work knows that sequences get updated every now and again, especially when the sequences are (a) important and (b) had a few low-coverage regions that might have had assembly errors. This changes nothing - and as you say, only a handful of completely insignificant changes. This is 100% business as usual - move on.
-
FWIW, the new sequences 100% match the consensus sequence I generated and shared on Virological, which might have been a better assembly than their own. It's possible that they just downloaded my bam files (which I made available on Google Cloud) and then they called the consensus from those. Again, all totally standard.
-
Yes, that's what I just told him. The tinfoil hats have got their diapers in a twist over it.
-
Of course they have. Sooooooooo mysterious [unless you actually know how to do this type of work]