Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.219 [SLACK_000433] · slack_pm:msg:02272

Date: 2020-10-16 07:10
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Haha, love that - I need to use that comic if somebody digs this out.. :wink:. I should point out that I prefer to be known as "Spiderman" though, not "Batman". It goes better with my climber alterego.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-10-16 07:10 Kristian G. Andersen

Haha, love that - I need to use that comic if somebody digs this out.. :wink:. I should point out that I prefer to be known as "Spiderman" though, not "Batman". It goes better with my climber alterego.
2020-10-16 07:10 Kristian G. Andersen open

@Andrew Rambaut Excellent, thanks Andrew. Out past 90+ days.... that's nuts.
2020-10-16 07:21 Andrew Rambaut open

@Andrew Rambaut Probably some dumb shit there too - contamination, mislabelling etc,
2020-10-16 07:22 Andrew Rambaut open

@Andrew Rambaut (this is all GISAID data but from back in May? some time)
2020-10-16 07:28 Kristian G. Andersen open

@Andrew Rambaut Yeah, I suspect that's probably true. The distribution is still fat around 30-40 days though and that sorta tells you everything you need to know about how hard inference is...

Full conversation →