COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, pp.205-206 [SLACK_000419] · slack_pm:msg:02138

Page text: p.205, p.206 · original PDF

Date
2020-10-02 06:54
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Robert F. Garry

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Eddies timeline very useful - yes fast but they type of response we'd hope becomes routine.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2020-10-02 06:27 Robert F. Garry open
    @Robert Garry Yes
  2. 2020-10-02 06:46 Kristian G. Andersen open
    @Robert Garry But look at the line of succession. If Pence is infected too, next on that list is Pelosi... Imagine theconstitutional crisis if we had to go down that list.I don't know man - I'm 55/45 on bullshit vs real. Let's see what happens...
  3. 2020-10-02 06:49 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Very interesting. I'd say that that's still a pretty quick response - Market was shut down 1/1, right? Could have been faster for sure, but not sure this is out of the ordinary give what must have been quite chaotic (plus stigma of SARS).
  4. 2020-10-02 06:51 Robert F. Garry open
    @Robert Garry Trump for sure knows he needed to shake up the election. I"m less than %5 that he joins @Covidfaker in the fake covid club, but that's non-trivial.
  5. 2020-10-02 06:54 Robert F. Garry
    Eddies timeline very useful - yes fast but they type of response we'd hope becomes routine.
  6. 2020-10-02 07:19 Kristian G. Andersen open
    If true - 100% BS: https://twitter.com/RanuDhillon/status/1311944315472547843?s=20 If she's only positive Wednesday afternoon, the likelihood of two people getting infected and having a positive result the day after would be near zero. That's not how it works.
  7. 2020-10-02 07:32 Robert F. Garry open
    Hicks, Trump and Melania probably got infected from the same index case. After they found out he was exposed from Hicks or someone else instead of quarantining he did fund-raisers so yes 100% BS - only thing certain is that they are lying there asses off about the timelines.
  8. 2020-10-02 07:34 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yes, very true - Hicks not being the index case (which is highly plausible) would explain the timeline. This kinda stuff on Twitter is fascinating (and scary): https://twitter.com/TimInHonolulu/status/1311883569086623744?s=20. Came across it from Carl's timeline.
  9. 2020-10-02 07:36 Kristian G. Andersen open
    If Hicks not index though, that puts Joe well within the danger zone... Shit.

Full conversation →