Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.203 [SLACK_000417] · slack_pm:msg:02107

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yes, only discuss this in private...although I see that Carl B. is posing some questions.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-10-01 23:10 Kristian G. Andersen open

Gotta ask though - do we actually believe he's got it? Or desperate last-ditch attempt given recent disasters? I wouldn't put it past him, but what a terrible thing to question... So I'll only do it in private :wink:
2020-10-01 23:18 Edward C. Holmes open

My immediate reaction is that is smells very fishy. Not that I'm a conspiracy theorist or anything (:sunglasses:), but getting the sympathy vote straight after a debate humiliation is a tad suspect. I predict a 'superman' recovery with nosymptoms...or an attempt to delay the election.
2020-10-01 23:18 Edward C. Holmes

Yes, only discuss this in private...although I see that Carl B. is posing some questions.
2020-10-01 23:20 Edward C. Holmes open

Can't see Trump giving it to Melania as they've been physically distant for years.
2020-10-01 23:25 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, the timing ain't right here... And I mean - Hicks is the PR 'genius' right. She reports a positive earlier today, hethen Tweets "we're getting tested" hours later and then two hours after that "we're positive". They have a million IDNow machines at the WH since everybody is getting tested constantly - that's a 15 minute test. Doesn't check out. [not that I'm a conspiracy theorist or anything].
2020-10-01 23:26 Andrew Rambaut open

I'm in the wrong timezone - missed some serious banter.
2020-10-01 23:26 Kristian G. Andersen open

You did