Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.189 [SLACK_000403] · slack_pm:msg:01946

Date: 2020-09-22 14:44
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Edward C. Holmes

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Hope the GVN thing was ok Bob. Would have been better - with more discussion - if they have not spent so much time patting each other on the back at the start.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-09-22 14:37 Robert F. Garry open

If assigning a grade I'd say A for effort, A+ for participation and B+ for content.
2020-09-22 14:44 Edward C. Holmes

Hope the GVN thing was ok Bob. Would have been better - with more discussion - if they have not spent so much time patting each other on the back at the start.
2020-09-22 14:44 Kristian G. Andersen open

I just read it as well - not very impressed. I'd say an over B- grade.
2020-09-22 14:46 Edward C. Holmes open

Do you know the Hopkins authors?
2020-09-22 14:46 Kristian G. Andersen open

Nope
2020-09-22 14:48 Kristian G. Andersen open

They got a number of things wrong - some of which could be problematic. E.g., they mention that SARS1 has a furin cleavage site in the spike - that's clearly not true and suggestive of them not looking very closely at the literature. I'll posit that my much shorter Twitter thread did a better job :wink:

Full conversation →