Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, pp.171-172 [SLACK_000385] · slack_pm:msg:01768

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I thought had better chime in with my non conflicts of interest though...

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-09-15 17:58 Edward C. Holmes open

It has played into our hands beautifully
2020-09-15 18:06 Edward C. Holmes open

Amusing that Inspector Clouseau still finds time to moan about the Proximal Origins paper even though it seems wewere right all along?
2020-09-15 18:26 Edward C. Holmes open

Enjoyed the thread.
2020-09-15 18:41 Kristian G. Andersen open

There will be no further comments. Promise...
2020-09-15 19:06 Edward C. Holmes

I thought had better chime in with my non conflicts of interest though...
2020-09-15 19:25 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, sorry - my usage of "we" was confusing referring to my lab (where I always say "our lab" and "we"...) and not necessarily the Proximal authors. Having collaborations with China clearly isn't a conflict either - and as you said, isa good thing ffs!