Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.158 [SLACK_000372] · slack_pm:msg:01615

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

(as you'll learn from that Boston Mag article - it's really terrible. Worse than I had expected to say the least - but agood waste of 30mins)

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-09-09 12:38 Kristian G. Andersen open

Oh boy, this article reads like a bad case of somebody just discovering evolution for the first time.... It's exceptionally bad - it'll be interesting to see if the Broad will go ahead and simply ignore it.
2020-09-09 13:24 Edward C. Holmes open

Xander's Figure 1 is going straight into my talks.
2020-09-09 13:27 Kristian G. Andersen open

I'm not quite sure I understand his figure, but hey - that doesn't seem to matter.
2020-09-09 13:27 Kristian G. Andersen

(as you'll learn from that Boston Mag article - it's really terrible. Worse than I had expected to say the least - but agood waste of 30mins)
2020-09-09 13:37 Edward C. Holmes open

I've not got the energy to read any of this stuff any more.
2020-09-09 13:40 Kristian G. Andersen open

This one is kinda cute - "scientist sees evolution in action for the first time and is perplexed by its complexity". Any argument against engineering is shot down as censorship. :thinking_face:
2020-09-09 14:17 Edward C. Holmes open

Xander's logic, and likely that of Alina, reminds me of this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yp_l5ntikaU