Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.143 [SLACK_000357] · slack_pm:msg:01467

Date: 2020-08-22 16:20
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yeah.... can't really dismiss potential passage or engineering based on a circular tree. I'm glad he's found his community on Twitter though - the highlight of any career. Surely.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-08-22 16:11 Edward C. Holmes open

Mental. Did you see his latest big tree Tweet as well? Says there was no evidence for lab passage etc. I agree, but you can't infer that from a dirty great circular tree.
2020-08-22 16:12 Kristian G. Andersen open

Didn't see that - link?
2020-08-22 16:13 Edward C. Holmes open

https://twitter.com/BallouxFrancois/status/1297207044664184832?s=20
2020-08-22 16:20 Kristian G. Andersen

Yeah.... can't really dismiss potential passage or engineering based on a circular tree. I'm glad he's found his community on Twitter though - the highlight of any career. Surely.
2020-08-22 16:27 Edward C. Holmes open

Surely. He's one a whole set of people who let Twitter go to their head.
2020-08-22 16:46 Kristian G. Andersen open

Very few have made that transition successfully - there are a handful though, like Natalie Dean who's managed tostay remarkably on point.
2020-08-22 17:10 Edward C. Holmes open

I draw the line at one who thinks they're living out a Camus novel.
2020-08-22 17:18 Kristian G. Andersen open

You're sooo old man :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

Full conversation →