Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.133 [SLACK_000347] · slack_pm:msg:01363

Date: 2020-08-10 08:35
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Robert F. Garry

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yeah - This will not help, but will be harmful. This is like an ex-postdoc of mine [I fired her]. To say she had no labskills did not capture the essence. She had negative lab skills.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-08-10 08:35 Robert F. Garry

Yeah - This will not help, but will be harmful. This is like an ex-postdoc of mine [I fired her]. To say she had no labskills did not capture the essence. She had negative lab skills.
2020-08-10 08:42 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, absolutely nothing in this reporting - but then again, what did they expect to find? It's a lab... like so many other labs. "Five virologists familiar with lab protocols found it improbable...". I guess that's us - which is kinda strange.

Full conversation →