Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.132 · slack_pm:msg:01355

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yes - told her no change -highly improbable.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-08-08 20:11 Robert F. Garry open

I thought the Today Show had a science contributor?
2020-08-08 20:11 Kristian G. Andersen open

Hah! And this is pretty interesting...
2020-08-08 20:11 Edward C. Holmes open

I got the same
2020-08-08 20:11 Edward C. Holmes open

Did you reply Bob?
2020-08-08 20:11 Robert F. Garry

Yes - told her no change -highly improbable.
2020-08-08 20:11 Edward C. Holmes open

I'll do the same
2020-08-08 20:11 Andrew Rambaut open

And that if they were doing GOF experiments in a Cat 4 lab then they are much more safety conscious than the Netherlands or the US.
2020-08-08 20:11 Robert F. Garry open

True! In other weekend emails - Virology Journal EiC (Batman!) asked me to participate in a letter re the CDC chloroquine/SARS paper clarifying that NIH/Fauci did not run the journal in 2005. Hmmm. Little known factoid: the only reason I started VJ was to provide a little balance - there was already a PNAS.
2020-08-08 20:11 Edward C. Holmes open

So bizarre that such a clarification is needed. Sums up the current mess we are in.