Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.113 [SLACK_000327] · slack_pm:msg:01160

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Or, alternatively, @Robert Garry did it to boost our Altmetric score. That's a legit move.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-07-27 19:55 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, but only a reviewer would be privy to this information - nobody on the call (unless they reviewed the paper) would know this.
2020-07-27 20:03 Edward C. Holmes open

May be. I dunno.
2020-07-27 20:07 Kristian G. Andersen open

It's possible Ron was that reviewer too - and then just relayed the whole story to Ralph. More likely, Ralph was the reviewer and talked to Ron about it and Ron probably said "that's funny, let me tell you something...". Ralph then got pissed when he saw Jon's article - once again not citing him - with our quotes once again stating that this is a natural virus. In the Baric universe, I could see how that would blow a fuse.
2020-07-27 20:08 Edward C. Holmes open

Yes, that makes sense to me.
2020-07-27 20:09 Kristian G. Andersen

Or, alternatively, @Robert Garry did it to boost our Altmetric score. That's a legit move.