COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.111 [SLACK_000325] · slack_pm:msg:01135

Page text: p.111 · original PDF

Date
2020-07-27 15:19
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Edward C. Holmes

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Here's the summary of Feb 7 sent to all people. [shared file(s): Summary.Feb7_MF.pdf]

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2020-07-27 15:16 Andrew Rambaut open
    I can't see it being Marion either.
  2. 2020-07-27 15:17 Kristian G. Andersen open
    I would be surprised if Marion was behind this, but I can't rule it out. I'm almost certain it's not Christian. I'm wondering if somebody could have mentioned this to e.g., Baric and then this is actually Baric - he always seemed pissed about the whole situation.
  3. 2020-07-27 15:18 Edward C. Holmes open
    But we sent them all a draft, inc. Ron. Email of Feb 10.
  4. 2020-07-27 15:19 Kristian G. Andersen open
    The subject of the email is interesting - "The authors who wrote the paper saying that SARS-CoV-2 is not human engineered first tried convincing Anthony Fauci of the opposite". Probably somebody in America?
  5. 2020-07-27 15:19 Edward C. Holmes
    Here's the summary of Feb 7 sent to all people. [shared file(s): Summary.Feb7_MF.pdf]
  6. 2020-07-27 15:20 Kristian G. Andersen open
    This part has me stumped "after quietly raising the alarm (*or "spreading the rumor", as Jeremy Farrar apparently put it*) "
  7. 2020-07-27 15:21 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Who would be privy to that information if Jeremy really said that?
  8. 2020-07-27 15:21 Andrew Rambaut open
    This channel starts on the 1st of Feb just prior to the phone call.
  9. 2020-07-27 15:21 Edward C. Holmes open
    Feb 9 from Jeremy, sent to all "We now have (and we will get more) the pangolin data (Eddie has) we think we cantie this up even tighter with the next iteration and make a conclusive statement which will then be the go to scientific statement to refer to.Eddie and I have just come off a call with the National Academy of Medicine in the US - who the White House has asked to produce a report on this...."

Full conversation →