Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.95 [SLACK_000309] · slack_pm:msg:00972

Date: 2020-07-05 15:30
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Edward C. Holmes
Topics: Wuhan Institute of Virology collaboration

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yes, concluding that RaRTG13 is the source is really dumb. As I said above, all this suggests to me is that the only interesting virus they have at the WIV is RaTG13 and not another that they were secretly working on that gave riseto SARS-CoV-2.

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
As I said above, all this suggests to me is that the only interesting virus they have at the WIV is RaTG13 and not another that they were secretly working on that gave riseto SARS-CoV-2.	own voice, substantive	speaker_own	asserts

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

As I said above, all this suggests to me is that the only interesting virus they have at the WIV is RaTG13 and not another that they were secretly working on that gave riseto SARS-CoV-2.

own voice, substantive

speaker_own

asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-07-05 15:30 Edward C. Holmes

Yes, concluding that RaRTG13 is the source is really dumb. As I said above, all this suggests to me is that the only interesting virus they have at the WIV is RaTG13 and not another that they were secretly working on that gave riseto SARS-CoV-2.

Full conversation →